Shooting straight at the wild goose

Posted on Wednesday 23 July 2008

According to the NY Times, an investigation into whether speculators are behind the run-up in energy prices has not yet found a smoking gun:

As Congress debates how to curtail the role of speculators and rein in rising oil prices, a federal task force said Tuesday that it had so far found no evidence that those investors are systematically pushing up the cost of energy.

Instead, in an interim report made public on Tuesday, the task force said that its research “does not support the hypothesis that the activity of these groups is driving prices higher.”

The preliminary study concluded that the rise in oil prices over the last five years was “largely due” to fundamental factors like rapidly rising consumption and sluggish growth in energy supplies worldwide.

The short-hand for that last paragraph is “supply and demand”. (You’re all just shocked, I know.)

Looks like Congress (and specifically, the Democratic leadership) is off on another wild goose chase.

Maybe they should just ask John McCain. That well-known straight shooter, ever alert for a mavericky moment (*cough*), is airing an ad about all the pain at the pump…. and who, specifically, is responsible for it.

Subtle like a brick, ole John, eh?

Polimom @ 2:06 pm
Filed under: Politics , Energy and Oil , John McCain
Winnfield, Louisiana: A great American Home Town

Posted on Wednesday 23 July 2008

How nice. If you visit this small city’s website, you’ll learn that Winnfield, Louisiana was named Louisiana’s top Home Town in February 2001.

A great home town is a place with deep roots. Great home towns have well-attended churches, lively places to meet, handsome historic buildings and lots of locally owned businesses. Their residents are devoted to the Power of Place - and now, a new company has measured that power for every place in the United States.

I took a look at ePodunk’s statistical sources for this honor, which center up on “rootedness” and “civic engagement”. All very nice, but I think they should have done a bit more research into Winnfield — a quiet little backwater where the coroner’s unpopular rulings have led him to keep his weapon on his hip, even while seated at his desk. From the Chicago Tribune:

Here in the birthplace of two of Louisiana’s most colorful and notorious governors–Huey and Earl Long–the police chief committed suicide three years ago after losing a close election marred by allegations of fraud and vote-buying.

Just four months later, the district attorney killed himself after allegedly skimming $200,000 from his office budget and extorting payments from criminal defendants to make their cases go away.

The current police chief is a convicted drug offender who got a pardon from Edwin Edwards, the former Louisiana governor who is serving time in federal prison for corruption convictions.

Ah yes, those Louisiana politics. So quirky and quaint. All part of that small town ambiance. From CNN:

A police officer shocked a handcuffed Baron “Scooter” Pikes nine times with a Taser after arresting him on a cocaine charge.

He stopped twitching after seven, according to a coroner’s report. Soon afterward, Pikes was dead.

Now the officer, since fired, could end up facing criminal charges in Pikes’ January death after medical examiners ruled it a homicide.

Dr. Randolph Williams, the Winn Parish coroner, told CNN the 21-year-old sawmill worker was jolted so many times by the 50,000-volt Taser that he might have been dead before the last two shocks were delivered.

Williams ruled Pikes’ death a homicide in June after extensive study.

The coroner’s June homicide ruling, btw, comes six months after the incident, and the taser-happy officer, Scott Nugent, still has not been charged, though he was fired, finally, in May.

Six months later, the Winnfield police are standing by [their original] story. Meanwhile, the Louisiana State Police are investigating the case, and no charges have been filed against Nugent or two other Winnfield police officers who assisted him in arresting Pikes, although the City Council did decide to fire Nugent from the force in May.

Winn Parish District Atty. Chris Nevils says he expects to present the case to a grand jury after he receives the results of the state police investigation.

Once can’t help but wonder what a grand jury will choose to do with this, considering the Winnfield Civil Service Board met yesterday, and couldn’t decide whether or not Nugent should be rehired — a real mind-boggler, considering his prior record with Taser use.

In the year since Winnfield police received Tasers, officers have used them 14 times, according to police records — with 12 of the instances involving black suspects. Ten of the 14 incidents involved Nugent, who has no public disciplinary record.

So — just another sad Taser story in the hands of a Big Badge Fever cop… right?

But Winnfield police Lt. Chuck Curry said race “isn’t an issue at all” in the matter.

“This has come down to a police officer that was trying to apprehend a suspect that they had warrants for,” he said. “He done what he thought he was trained to do to bring that subject into custody. At some point, something happened with his body that caused him to go into cardiac arrest or whatever.”

Something happened indeed…

Had ePodunk looked a bit deeper at their idyllic spots, in fact, they might have decided to add more criteria. Because there seem to be some real problems in this little slice of America. From City-Data.com:

Unemployment rate for White non-Hispanic males: 6.8%
Unemployment rate for White non-Hispanic females: 7.1%

Unemployment rate for Black males: 21.6%
Unemployment rate for Black females: 13.7%

Under the circumstances, it’s pretty hard to believe race “isn’t an issue at all”.

Polimom @ 10:23 am
Filed under: Crime and Justice , Race Relations , society
Fools, cads, and alien babies

Posted on Wednesday 23 July 2008

If there was any time during the presidential primaries when I felt personally moved by a candidate’s story, it was when Elizabeth Edwards’ cancer returned. Her strength of will and support for her husband John was uplifting — a testament to love and commitment.

Whatever I think of John Edwards’ politics, I admire his wife, and their marriage, immensely.

Furthermore — since it was always pretty obvious that John Edwards’ candidacy wasn’t going anywhere (again) — rumors that he had had an affair struck me as both irrelevant and tasteless. I (and most folks) ignored the entire situation.

Not only that, but since the rag of record on the story also likes to blast out headlines like “Woman gives birth to Alien Baby with Three Heads”, it was easy to dismiss.

Now, the National Enquirer has come back around with their story, claiming that they were tipped off about a clandestine meeting Monday night… and so they lurked and stalked, and ultimately confronted Edwards (who then hid in a bathroom for 15 minutes to avoid them, the story says).

Since the National Enquirer has a circulation of over 1 million, it’s obvious that a certain segment of our society laps these kinds of stories up. Such behavior is laughed at and tolerated in… say… twisted former teen stars. But America has very little tolerance for cads, and prefers to keep known fools out of the White House (though they do sneak in now and again) — and if this tale is true, then John Edwards is both a fool and a despicable cad.

For the sake of his wife, I really hope this turns out to be just another Alien Baby story.

Polimom @ 8:18 am
Filed under: society , scandal
Shiny Red Boots

Posted on Tuesday 22 July 2008

When Adorable Child was in elementary school, I volunteered to teach a Junior Achievement module. The subject was “Want vs Need”, and my targets were squirmy little six-year-olds in first grade.

Since I had an entire six weeks with which to work, I decided to build a frame first… and so we started with shoes — my shoes.

I love to go barefoot. There’s just nothing quite like the tickle of the grass around my ankles, or the strange sliminess of mud squishing up between my toes.

[giggles and ewwwwws]

And I can get out the door much faster if I don’t have to stop and put shoes on first — very helpful when I’m in a hurry to tickle AC.

[more giggles, with some nudging of AC]

But in the summer in Texas, the sidewalk burns my feet! I can’t stand there for more than a few seconds before it feels like they’re frying and I start hopping around like a grasshopper. And I look really silly, mincing across a patch of gravel, afraid to put my feet down on those sharp rock edges.

[nods and interruptions as everybody tells a gravel story]

And sometimes, there are really dangerous things waiting to bite at my toes, or take a big chunk out of the bottom of my foot. Like nails. Or glass.

They got it. We need shoes. Our feet are sensitive, and also vulnerable.

Over the next week or two, we talked a lot about physical needs. Food. Shelter. Clothing. And then we came back around to shoes.

Now, Polimom loves the color red. Bright red — like the sun just before it sets. And one day at the mall, I saw a pair of really beautiful, shiny, high-heeled boots in a store window. They were glorious! And exactly my color! The more I looked at them, the more I knew I had to have them. Had to! I loved those shiny red boots!

[out and out laughter, with some background discussion on favorite colors]

I needed those boots!

They weren’t sure about this.

There were some tentative nods, since boots are, technically, shoes, but there were also some head-shakes and “No’s”.

But we all agreed that we need shoes, didn’t we? And these gorgeous shiny red boots are perfect for me, and they’ll match my red dress and earrings! I won’t be happy if I can’t have them! I need them!

[Kids] No…. You don’t need them, Mrs. Polimom — you want them.

Of course they were right. I didn’t need them, anymore than I need chocolate for sustenance, or a BMW for transportation — and we talked about all of that, too. A want, no matter how badly desired, does not equate to a need.

Recently, in light of the credit crisis, I’ve been thinking a lot about chocolate and BMWs and fancy shoes. If first-graders could understand this most basic of lessons, how is it that we now have a culture that needs shiny red boots?

David Brooks writes that we’ve become a “Culture of Debt” — that “norms changed and people began making jokes to make illicit things seem normal”.

Instead of condemning hyper-consumerism, they made quips about “retail therapy,” or repeated the line that Morgenson noted in her article: When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping.

I agree with him. Our society is being eaten alive by consumerism. But Brooks is only acknowledging part of the credit crisis equation — because while it’s absolutely true that many people have been conflating want with need, a want sometimes is a need.

[T]heir homes were now showing those signs of neglect. They needed a roof, they needed their porches repaired and their money was all tied up in the equity of their home. And that’s what they needed to tap into in order to make any repairs.

There are an awful lot of “needs” packed into that paragraph, but it really doesn’t sound like a shiny red boot story to me. The real problem is in the last sentence.

Was an equity tap really the only option? And who sought out whom, in the lending equation? Because predatory lending isn’t a figment of the liberal imagination; the responsibility for the mortgage market meltdown can’t be laid fully at the feet of the borrowers. It was a known, looming problem years ago.

The credit crisis isn’t just the result of a changed society. Yes, I do think that norms have changed. As a parent, I push back against the onslaught every day. And yes, I agree — there are lots of people walking around in shiny red boots they couldn’t afford.

But there are also people who borrowed money to patch the holes in the soles of their very basic — and totally necessary — footwear.

One can fairly debate whether society should be funding those patches, but it’s hard to deny the need.

Even a first grader can understand the difference.

Polimom @ 11:12 am
Filed under: society , Economy
Boosting Obama

Posted on Saturday 19 July 2008

Sure enough, the minute I say I’m going to be offline for a few days, something happens. This, though, is a really big “something”:

SPIEGEL: Would you hazard a prediction as to when most of the US troops will finally leave Iraq?

Maliki: As soon as possible, as far as we’re concerned. U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.

SPIEGEL: Is this an endorsement for the US presidential election in November? Does Obama, who has no military background, ultimately have a better understanding of Iraq than war hero John McCain?

Maliki: Those who operate on the premise of short time periods in Iraq today are being more realistic. Artificially prolonging the tenure of US troops in Iraq would cause problems. Of course, this is by no means an election endorsement.

However one chooses to slice and dice McCain v Obama on Iraq across the past six years, there’s a very clear distinction between them in how they plan to approach the future. And al-Maliki has even more clearly signalled his preference.

This is a very big deal.

* * * * *

Here are a few snippets of opinion and reaction. I encourage you to read them in their entirety.

Dr. Steven Taylor at Poliblog:

This strikes me a boon for Obama, as it enhances his credence in terms of the Iraq question.

Elrod at The Moderate Voice:

But if this is a debate about the future, Maliki has just signaled that Obama’s position is more strategically sound for Iraq and tactically acceptable than McCain’s open-ended commitment.

And then there’s this brave soul — an Obama supporter writing at RedState (of all places):

The big question for McCain is how to respond to this kind of talk. I’m not sure what the best answer is, but as of now it seems that he needs to start undercutting Maliki’s competence, judgment, etc. I’m not sure it will work, but he can’t afford to have the elected Iraqi government essentially campaigning for Obama.

More here at memeorandum.

Added: This is just flat-out funny. And I really feel compelled to respond to this little tidbit from The American Mind (my emphasis):

First, realize Maliki sees Obama as the Presidential front runner. It’s rational not to rock the boat. Second, Iraq and the U.S. wouldn’t be in this situation if it weren’t for the surge that quelled violence.

That is absolutely the McCain campaign’s narrative on Iraq. It has to be, since it’s all they’ve got now. And you can bet your bottom dollar that many millions of Americans will recall — with or without the reminders that are surely coming — that the dire situation that led to the surge was predicated by an incredibly stupid invasion.

Polimom @ 12:17 pm
Filed under: Iraq , War , Barack Obama
Other duties call…

Posted on Friday 18 July 2008

Dear Husband is out of town, Adorable Child has a Birthday Bash tonight, and Polimom’s back is to the wall.

As a result, I’m probably out of the loop for a few days, baking cakes and ordering pizzas and supervising hair-straightening and blowing up balloons. Lots of fun, but very time-consuming.

If the sky falls between now and Monday, though, I’m sure the (usually) Politically Sane folks listed in the sidebar will be covering the story.

:>

Added: Here’s an example of what I expect to be supervising tonight. (It takes some practice to keep it out of one’s eye.)

Mascara

This, on the other hand, is likely to be in VERY short supply:

I, my loved one, watch am keeping

LOL!

Polimom @ 9:57 am
Filed under: parenting , Blogging
Mom, that’s not FAIR!

Posted on Wednesday 16 July 2008

I used to hear it all the time.

AC: Mom, can I have a TV for my room?

Polimom: No, Adorable Child. The TV in the den is for us all to watch, and there’s another for the gameroom when you have friends over. We don’t need televisions everywhere in the house.

AC: But my friend Janey has one in her room!!

Polimom: Sweet Pea, when you grow up and have a job and kids, you are free to put a tv in every room in your house if you think that’s the right way to raise your children. And if Janey’s mom thinks Janey should have a tv in her bedroom, that’s her choice. Your mom, though, thinks two televisions for a household of 3 people is plenty.

AC: That’s not fair!!!

This argument has had many variations over the years, but it generally ended exactly the same way: that’s not “fair”.

As AC has gotten older, though, I’ve added more options. For instance:

AC: Mom, I want an iPod. Janey and Susie have iPods, I’m the only person I know that doesn’t have an iPod.

Polimom: (gives variation on dialogue above)

AC: But Mo-o-o-o-om! I have no way to listen to music!

Polimom: I have no problem with iPods specifically, but I don’t see a “need” for me to buy one for you. If it’s truly something you want, though, perhaps there are some jobs we have around the house that you could do to earn some money. Then, you can buy one for yourself.

She now owns a hot pink iPod, but the phrase “it’s not fair” did not come up — even though I know for a fact that Janey and Susie did not work for their iPods. She may very well think I’m a mean mom, but she’s finally starting to understand the ground rules.

Even more importantly, though, she’s starting to understand that life is filled with choices, and that there are values underpinning them. She knows, for instance, that I don’t approve of pre-teens disappearing into their rooms for hours on end, staring zombie-like at a screen; that reading books allows the mind to grow, as opposed to the stultifying mindlessness inherent in watching television; that it’s important for a parent to know what shows are being watched. And then there’s the little matter of a work ethic…

Fairness, as a concept, does not figure into any of this.

Yet this odd, childish (and not-so-endearing) interpretation of “fair” does not end at childhood. It extends to questions asked in our society every day, as described by Patrick Edaburn’s post at TMV.

It is thus hardly surprising that these people [from “The Barney Generation”] now expect that they should be given everything they want or need as an adult. Of course there are many very hard working members of the Barney generation and hopefully they will overcome this trend.

If they do, then there can be much to gain from a generation whose desire to achieve is tempered with a sense of fair play.

If they do not, then we will continue on our trend towards a society where the many depend on the few, and that can never last.

Speaking as a parent, I can attest to the fact that we are raising a generation smack-full of over-indulged kids whose expectations are completely out of kilter with generations past.

Obviously, Patrick’s right when he writes that not everyone is coming up with such bizarre and unsustainable expectations — but what he doesn’t say is that it’s extremely difficult to stand against the tide. I often feel as if the sands are sucking out from beneath my feet, and the only thing that keeps me upright is the knowledge that, however difficult it is for me, Adorable Child would be overwhelmed immediately without my help.

How will it be any easier when the entire societal wave is pushing against her — and those who were raised the same way — when we’re gone?

Polimom @ 9:38 am
Filed under: parenting , society