Spending this week as a juror has been educational in ways I never could have imagined – some good, some bad. Now that it’s concluded, though, I’m finally allowed to divulge specifics, and given that I started blogging as a place to “talk”, I’m enormously relieved. (More “talk” about the case here.)
Courtrooms, and the entire judicial system, are littered with broken dreams. Defendants and victims alike are in the midst of life-altering judgments and decisions, and all by itself, that would have been enough to capture Polimom’s full attention.
However, there was another aspect to all of this that was hugely relevant to much of what I’ve written in recent weeks; this defendant was an illegal immigrant.
We were not “officially” aware of his status until the sentencing, but it was fairly obvious, and it added a dimension to the entire proceeding that I hadn’t anticipated. Furthermore, listening to his testimony (through an interpreter) gave me insight into a number of things. For instance:
— This man had never been to school. Ever. Anywhere. He didn’t know the street number of the house he lived in, and he could barely sign his name.
— Seven days a week (unless it rained), he stood out on a corner to be picked up (hopefully) for work, and he’d had a prior arrest – for stealing food from an HEB.
What an abysmally sad life this man has led here in America in his quest for “something better”, and in spite of our careful community cross-section on the jury, I can assure you that not one of us could possibly be defined as his “peer”. Not by a mile.
The streets here are not paved with gold; it is a hard life for an uneducated, illiterate illegal immigrant, and Polimom wishes with all her heart that he had simply stayed at home in his little village in Mexico. Instead, he’ll spend the next five years in a Texas prison – hardly the American dream.
Surely, no matter how hard a life he had in Mexico, it was better than what he faces now.
Leave a Reply Cancel Reply
Read Next
I came across this quote in a Washington Post article: I think voters are more concerned about health-care costs, the cost of higher education and gasoline and energy than immigration.” Is that true, do you think?
When Ken Lay died, he had already been found guilty of the charges against him for his role in the Enron debacle… but his lawyers had not yet started the appeals process. This brought up an interesting legal precedent: because …
I’m sorry, folks, but some of the spin coming from the Republicans is a little hard to stomach — and Tony Snow is right up there with the worst of it (from The Moderate Voice, his emphasis in the same …
Since Polimom’s Adorable Child (AC) was born, I’ve wakened countless times in the night, full of anxiety that some stranger had come to snatch her from her bed. I stumble down the hall, careen into her room and stare into …

I wonder in light of your recent experience with the criminal justice system how on earth you can support the death penalty.
Hollis,
Good question! It was one of the things I was troubled with during deliberations. However, this case was a “he says she says” kind of thing. Not a lick of physical evidence, scientific or otherwise.
I don’t think I could support the death penalty without overwhelming evidence (which we didn’t have). But there are cases in which such evidence exists in abudance.