Race and marriage: Shoring up the pillars

Leave a Reply

Comment as a guest.
Avatar

  1. Pingback: The Moderate Voice
  2. “Children are far more likely to thrive in a stable, two-parent environment” and it’s not worth trying to make this state of being more prevalent?? Ridiculous. As a society our goal should be to generate the best outcomes possible for all of us. Seems obvious that increasing the number of stable nuclear families and reducing the number of welfare recipients would be part of that.
    As you imply, there’s no shame in being divorced or in being a single mother or father.
    But there is, or should be, shame in being an under-age, under-educated parent on the dole – the shame of poor judgment. For an individual, is there any more complete failure than creating a life one isn’t prepared to care for?
    We can shrug our shoulders, sigh “oh well”, and ask the Feds write some more bad checks – that’s worked really well so far – or we can try to do better. It’s not as if this is an unsolvable problem and building better marriages is the best place to start.

  3. As a single mother who put everything I have into getting my children to a better place, I would love to hear more of what you mean by, “we should focus on helping single mothers do what Polimom did, while simultaneously and separately recognizing and responding to the societal ills that led there.”
    What did you do? How do get people to focus on the societal ills “separately.”? As you can see from Marc’s response above, there is still a strong current of blaming the single mothers — not the fathers or the social ills that put women in a position of facing life and raising a child on their own.
    I was fortunate enough to have my children when I was already an educated adult, and to have the means to leave when I had to — yet it’s still an awful solution for all of us. It is, as you say, better than the alternative. How can society break the cycle when it blames the individuals?
    -M

  4. marc said:

    “As a society our goal should be to generate the best outcomes possible for all of us. Seems obvious that increasing the number of stable nuclear families and reducing the number of welfare recipients would be part of that.”

    Yes, indeed. However, the question is what is the best outcome possible for single parents with kids? marc refers to “being an under-age, under-educated parent on the dole” but that doesn’t seem to be the scenario in the post.
    Polimom (and also M it sounds like) was a well educated, mature adult when she married and had a child. For whatever reason, the marriage failed, and she decided she and AC would be better off by themselves. Maybe she was right and maybe she was wrong but it sounds like a life on welfare was never even conceivable for her, let alone an attractive option. She (and M) chose the hard road of self-reliance, not public assistance.
    As for the “being an under-age, under-educated parent on the dole”, what outcomes are possible for such a parent, especially a female? If she’s poor and living in the inner city, it’s very possible that she was raised by a single Mom, and most of her neighbors were / are single Moms, or married women with functionally worthless husbands. If this girl / woman looks around her for husband material, what are her options, the 6th grade dropout with an IQ of 85? The runner for the local drug dealer (if she can catch him outside of the penal system)? How about the local drug addict, or drunk?
    Depending on the options available, single parenthood may well be the best outcome. It takes TWO stable people to make a working marriage. To say marriage should always be the goal presupposes that the two parties being married are capable of filling the married roles.
    Polimom (and others) have written much on the lack of good marriageable prospects for many women, especially poor, black, uneducated women. The “talent pool” can be shallow and not well stocked.
    As for the reasons why attractive, well educated women all too often seem to be drawn–like moths to the flame–to men who are losers . . . . well, that’s a topic for another day and another post, I hope!

  5. “As for the reasons why attractive, well educated women all too often seem to be drawn–like moths to the flame–to men who are losers . . . . well, that’s a topic for another day and another post, I hope!”
    Absolutely – get that thread started. Why is that????

Read Next

Sliding Sidebar