During a “go to bed” conversation some years ago, Adorable Child (AC) asked Polimom, “Mommy, would our lives be different if we were black?”
Overwhelmed by imponderables of societal changes and cultural differences, geography and education, my mind immediately shut down; how can one possibly explain such complexity to a five-year-old?
My rather weak response was, “Probably, but it’s hard to say what, exactly, would be different.”
In the years since, I’ve mentally returned to her question many times, because it didn’t come from thin air. Polimom has often told her about our ancestors, including those who were once slaves — and the choices they made over 200 years ago set our feet on the path we walk today.
I can’t unravel the knotted threads of seven generations or more; I could only look in the mirror at hand, and at the time of AC’s question, Polimom was a single mother who had just purchased a house — an achievement underpinned by many months of enormous sacrifice. The overriding feature of my life then was my (un)married status, and it was also the very last feature I was interested in changing.
Five years later, an opinion piece by Yolanda Young in USAToday has given me a way to answer, but it’s based on a different version of AC’s question: How would our lives be the same?
The plight of single black women has received widespread attention in recent years — cover stories in Essence and Newsweek magazines and countless newspaper articles. This year, the movie Something New even opened up the possibility of dating outside the race since some 42.4% of black women might never marry because of the dearth of marriageable black men. Nationally, there are 10 single black women for every seven single black men. The picture looks worse if you subtract those who are incarcerated and unemployed.
These statistics are grim, but they’re also enlightening, and what they illuminate is difficult to face. We are a country that refuses to acknowledge — or even discuss — the ramifications of failed drug “wars”, alcoholism, domestic violence, urban poverty, and related intercommunity crime, and our blinders are setting us up for a national crisis.
But when one removes the ethnicity from the marriage / divorce equation, there’s a common denominator that carries across all color lines: single parenthood is very often the best solution to an overwhelming, insurmountable problem that no amount of counseling or good intentions can overcome.
For years, social conservatives have been concerned about the breakdown in traditional families, and while I often object to the language and approach they take, I understand the concern. Children are far more likely to thrive in a stable, two-parent environment. However, these well-intentioned social architects are overlooking something crucial: two parents don’t necessarily equate to stability.
Single moms, regardless of ethnicity, don’t need to be told that their lives, and those of their children, have greater odds of success if they are married; they already know that. There’s no “new” information there.
And while some might find being a single black woman distressing, married women reported being in poorer health. This according to “The Consequences of Marriage for African Americans,” published last year by the pro-marriage Institute for American Values, a non-profit aimed at improving marriage.
Hopefully, the grants will help unlock the code to a healthy marriage. Until then, remaining single might be the key to wellness and contentment.
It isn’t because of some disdain for tradition that a woman divorces. Nobody takes the harder road because they’re interested in character-building; they do so because the alternative was worse, and this problem spans every color line. It is simply more pervasive, and thus more critical, in black communities.
The solution to broken families won’t be found in pushing marriage; alone, it solves nothing. Strengthening individuals, however, will. In The Prophet, Kahlil Gibran wrote:
For the pillars of the temple stand apart,
And the oak tree and the cypress grow not in each other’s shadow.
Society is wasting its time promoting happiness or stability through marriage when the individual pillars cannot stand independently.
Instead of increasing the guilt and sense of failure divorced people already experience, we should focus on helping single mothers do what Polimom did, while simultaneously and separately recognizing and responding to the societal ills that led there.
Like AC, society is asking the wrong question: it isn’t about what is different, but what is the same, and if we shore up the pillars, the question will answer itself.
“Children are far more likely to thrive in a stable, two-parent environment” and it’s not worth trying to make this state of being more prevalent?? Ridiculous. As a society our goal should be to generate the best outcomes possible for all of us. Seems obvious that increasing the number of stable nuclear families and reducing the number of welfare recipients would be part of that.
As you imply, there’s no shame in being divorced or in being a single mother or father.
But there is, or should be, shame in being an under-age, under-educated parent on the dole – the shame of poor judgment. For an individual, is there any more complete failure than creating a life one isn’t prepared to care for?
We can shrug our shoulders, sigh “oh well”, and ask the Feds write some more bad checks – that’s worked really well so far – or we can try to do better. It’s not as if this is an unsolvable problem and building better marriages is the best place to start.
As a single mother who put everything I have into getting my children to a better place, I would love to hear more of what you mean by, “we should focus on helping single mothers do what Polimom did, while simultaneously and separately recognizing and responding to the societal ills that led there.”
What did you do? How do get people to focus on the societal ills “separately.”? As you can see from Marc’s response above, there is still a strong current of blaming the single mothers — not the fathers or the social ills that put women in a position of facing life and raising a child on their own.
I was fortunate enough to have my children when I was already an educated adult, and to have the means to leave when I had to — yet it’s still an awful solution for all of us. It is, as you say, better than the alternative. How can society break the cycle when it blames the individuals?
-M
marc said:
Yes, indeed. However, the question is what is the best outcome possible for single parents with kids? marc refers to “being an under-age, under-educated parent on the dole” but that doesn’t seem to be the scenario in the post.
Polimom (and also M it sounds like) was a well educated, mature adult when she married and had a child. For whatever reason, the marriage failed, and she decided she and AC would be better off by themselves. Maybe she was right and maybe she was wrong but it sounds like a life on welfare was never even conceivable for her, let alone an attractive option. She (and M) chose the hard road of self-reliance, not public assistance.
As for the “being an under-age, under-educated parent on the dole”, what outcomes are possible for such a parent, especially a female? If she’s poor and living in the inner city, it’s very possible that she was raised by a single Mom, and most of her neighbors were / are single Moms, or married women with functionally worthless husbands. If this girl / woman looks around her for husband material, what are her options, the 6th grade dropout with an IQ of 85? The runner for the local drug dealer (if she can catch him outside of the penal system)? How about the local drug addict, or drunk?
Depending on the options available, single parenthood may well be the best outcome. It takes TWO stable people to make a working marriage. To say marriage should always be the goal presupposes that the two parties being married are capable of filling the married roles.
Polimom (and others) have written much on the lack of good marriageable prospects for many women, especially poor, black, uneducated women. The “talent pool” can be shallow and not well stocked.
As for the reasons why attractive, well educated women all too often seem to be drawn–like moths to the flame–to men who are losers . . . . well, that’s a topic for another day and another post, I hope!
“As for the reasons why attractive, well educated women all too often seem to be drawn–like moths to the flame–to men who are losers . . . . well, that’s a topic for another day and another post, I hope!”
Absolutely – get that thread started. Why is that????
LOL!!!!!!!! Whole books have been dedicated to the subject of women and their odd choices in men, and still we repeat the pattern.
Meanwhile, the CS Monitor also had an opinion on this subject:
Single moms with no ‘I do’ in sight
From the thread at TMV comes this related article.