Does it really have to continue into the next generations? And why would anyone facilitate such a thing?
How to demonize Israel
Read the whole post, updates and all…
Leave a Reply Cancel Reply
Read Next
So — President Bush has finally liberated his veto pen: President Bush today used the first veto of his presidency to stop legislation that would have lifted restrictions on federally funded human embryonic stem cell research. “This bill would support …
Ya know, the new media has a lot of great things going for it: people can dialogue, network, call out crazies on the opposite side of their personal issue fences – it’s all good. But there’s one heck of a …
Updated and bumped from early this morning, to accommodate some roundups and updates at the bottom. Just when Polimom felt things were looking irredeemably hopeless in Iraq (CNN): Terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the coalition’s most wanted man in Iraq, …
This story is horrifying on so many levels to me as a parent (from CNN). The video shows a brutal scene: The 16-year-old victim is punched, kneed and slapped by other girls. She huddles in the fetal position, or stands …

This is the famous duality of Quantum Politico-Ethics. The kids and parents are the political equivalent of Schroedinger’s Cats: If they are in a camp that is sealed and there are no photographers there to record whether they are writing on the bombs, we cannot know whether they write on ’em or not. As soon as a single flashbulb pops (or a reporter asks any single question), it changes the conditions in the camp such that no one can know the state before the flashbulb popped (or the reporter asked the question).
Feel free to replace the scenario with almost any political/ethical dilemma that one can face either in the glare of the media or in the quiet of one’s darkened room. The media can affect people’s actions or not affect people’s actions. A camera might make a normally violent person stop the violence or might make a normally peaceful person violent. It might do neither — in which case how do you know whether violence is the act for the media, or the reality? You can never know what affect — if any — the cameras had on the humans involved — even more so, i think, or kids. And cats.
I think Schroedinger’s cat is perfectly alive and just taking a nap. But then, I always was an optimist.
Gotta love physics.
“…why would anyone facilitate such a thing?”
Stress relief, maybe. Publicity, almost certainly. An act of defiance, definitely. This isn’t the first time this has been done (thinking of the Doolittle raid back in 1942, fast forward to First Gulf War.) Yes, those were military folks writing messages and attaching medals to bombs – but the concept is the same, I guess.
It is somewhat scary, though. If the USofA and one of its neighbors were in this type of shooting war, would our children be doing the same thing?
~EdT.