The EPA (and the EPA)

Leave a Reply

Comment as a guest.
Avatar

  1. The Bush EPA arguably tried their stupidest semantic evasion yet–more blatant even than breach/overtopping and all the Iraq stuff. They actually tried to claim that legislation that required plants to install pollution control when they made any changes, didn’t apply to all changes . As the court said:
    In this context, there is no reason the usual tools of statutory construction should not apply and hence no reason why “any” should not mean “any.”
    That’s from the D.C. court, it’s not exactly known for its liberalism. Kevin Drum had a good post at the Washington Monthly.

  2. Any, all… such quibblers in the world, eh?
    You’re right about Kevin Drum’s post…. and the dialogue in the comments was a great read, too. Thanks for sharing the link!

Read Next

Airport insecurity

Sliding Sidebar