While writing some posts this week, it occurred to me that folks who read Polimom may not know which political blogs I read…. or why. I realize that there have been occassions when my sourcing has caused confusion (as one local Houston blogger discovered).
Polimom doesn’t read opinions from one side or another of an issue, and that becomes progressively less likely as the heat of a debate increases.
Why? Because part of my goal (Ha! Didn’t know I had one, did you?) is to find the places on difficult issues where people can agree. If I only read (or write about) opinion sources that mirror my own, I really don’t have much to add to the blogosphere, do I? It already functions pretty much as an echo chamber.
However, I discovered long ago that all liberals are not moonbats, and that all conservatives are not wingnuts. (For the record, though…. many from both sides do seem to be totally around the bend.)
Not only do I read these folks, I’m highly likely to go out of my way to link them when they take a position on an issue that might surprise their political opposites. A great example is Paul at the Wizbang blog. If you think all of conservative America hates New Orleans, or thinks New Orleanians somehow brought “the Thing” down upon themselves, you might feel soothed while perusing his archives on the subject (and his personal note).
By the same token, when a blogger consistently demonstrates an unhinged mind, Polimom has been known to link them, too — as examples of the insanity.
Some folks have drawn the rather odd conclusion that because I’m open-minded, or inclusive, I’m “undecided”. *blows raspberries* No. However, I don’t like either party these days, and I believe that compromise is the only way we’re going to salvage the tatters of our system.
So… over the next few days, I’m going to be radically adding to my blogroll(s). You’ll likely notice links you’ve historically considered too far from your own position to normally read, and since I don’t know your positions, you may be right. You may also be one of those folks who can’t read an opposing position without a dangerous rise in blood pressure. (sigh… I’m sorry….)
In the interim, I wanted to bring a couple of blogsites out of my “favorites” closet. They may not realize that Polimom considers them to be rational (nor will they care, I’m sure), but in this increasingly polarized political atmosphere, there’s a real need for sanity and wider views.
Outside the Beltway – James Joyner’s analysis, even when I don’t agree, is thoughtful and reasoned. His post today on the “outing of Armando” controversy is a great example.
The Gun Toting Liberal – Just in case you’re one of those folks who thinks that all the liberals are not pleased about al-Zarqawi’s death, his post on the subject might bring you back to earth.
Look for these, and others, to hit the links in the left nav in the next few days. I’m slow with some of this maintenance “stuff” in the summer, but at least it’s a start…
Leave a Reply Cancel Reply
Read Next
Updated and bumped from early this morning, to accommodate some roundups and updates at the bottom. Just when Polimom felt things were looking irredeemably hopeless in Iraq (CNN): Terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the coalition’s most wanted man in Iraq, …
Of all the issues facing folks in my community in November, I would have thought the least complicated was Katy ISD’s bond issue. We have a community growing so explosively that schools are filling as fast as they can be …
I’m loving this: Saints 27, Eagles 24 And now they’re 5 – 1. Ha! Maybe folks who so bizarrely thought the New Orleans bruising of Atlanta was some kind of set-up get it now… ya think?
Since my last post, I’ve been unable to write. It isn’t that I have nothing to say (that’s hardly ever true), but my thoughts are swirling… unfocused, and what follows here is a bit of a jumble. Sorry. Politics has …
Thanks! The key, I think, is starting with the premise that most actors in the system–whether politicians, reporters, other bloggers, or whomever–are honorable and merely disagree. Unfortunately, the opposite presumption is more marketable in the punditry game.
James,
I like your thinking. In the dim, ancient cobwebbed corners of my mind, I seem to recall a time when I, too, assumed the best of people’s motives. Thanks for reminding me.
Hey there… I just wanted to thank you for noticin’ 😉 Also want to thank you sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, for linking and advocating our blog, and for seeking what you are through blogging here. It’s an admirable mission, and if you don’t mind me saying so, you can find a whole slough more of us at the American Bloggers for Inclusive Debates blogroll, which you might find to have great potential. No pressure, just thought you might enjoy the hat tip 😉
Regardless, I thank you again for everything you have done, and for everything you are doing. Blog ONNNNN, friend!
Thanks, Polimom! I can always depend on you for balance and equality. I will check out the blogs you have mentioned. It’s so overwhelming trying to find fair-minded bloggers on one’s own. Take care!