The need for change

Leave a Reply

Comment as a guest.

  1. “…we really can’t afford to continue on the current path.”
    And the nice thing is that, in no more than 2 years, we won’t. Because that is when W is out of office (thanks to term-limits placed in the Constitution), and somebody else is going to take over the helm.
    Now, as to what the level of change is that we will see, I guess it depends on who gets the job.

  2. For an interesting slant on the proper approach to the mid-term elections, see The Case for Staying Home. It might be the approach for ’08 as well. If we don’t give the talentless who will be elected in either year a mandate we can at least blunt the scope of their authority. If Katrina taught us anything it is that we’re better off without the bumbling boobs that are the Feds.

Read Next

Sliding Sidebar