In the aftermath of the Democratic nomination contest, just about everybody’s come forward with an analysis of what happened to Hillary Clinton.
Her supporters see it as tragic proof that the US is deeply, unapologetically sexist, and/or that the election was stolen. The comments on Hillary’s most ardent supporting blogs are filled with rage and bitterness. They say they’re going to exact revenge; support McCain; write in Hillary; bring down the Democratic Party.
Hillary’s detractors have written ad nauseum about how they perceive her as selfish and self-serving. She was vilified for staying married to a fornicator; for launching her senate career from a state in which she had to establish residency; for claiming executive experience from her years as “First Wife”.
For millions of people both for and against, Hillary Clinton’s campaign was unbelievably personal. How ironic, then, that it is the candidate herself who achieved the most personal triumph possible.
She individuated herself.
Bill and Hillary have been indelibly intertwined in the national psyche for nearly two decades. Everybody knew who she was, but for the most part the association was “Former First Lady”, or “Bill Clinton’s wife”… and she didn’t hesitate to leverage that name recognition heavily.
By launching under Bill’s banner, she necessarily had to leave space for his presence beside her, where he immediately (and unfortunately) sucked up all the light. The connection between them was crucial to the “inevitability” theme, but regardless of how one regards Bill Clinton’s presidency, that truly was not a compliment to Hillary as an individual.
It didn’t matter whether he was beloved or hated; a successful president or a failure. Relying upon his luminosity to launch her national campaign diminished her personally.
Her problem was not that she is a woman. That’s far too generic and shallow an analysis. The real pitfall was that she attempted to share a spotlight that already illuminated someone else — and that same someone cast an enormous shadow.
That is no longer the case.
When I think of Hillary Clinton these days, my first association is not her husband… and I couldn’t say that six months ago. Bill’s shadow is barely discernible to me today.
Hillary Rodham Clinton may have lost her party’s nomination, but she gained something that could never have been awarded via votes or delegates or donations.
She casts her own shadow now. Good for her.
Polimom Says Articles.
I can’t tell whether some of the women who support Clinton are taking their marbles and going home, or they’re planning to pick their marbles up and throw them at everybody. Whatever they’re planning to do, they’ll need to find …
From the comments this morning: I wouldn’t vote for Obama because I don’t trust him. That doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t vote for another person of African descent. For example, I would have no problem with Condi Rice. So, what …
While I’ve been offline recovering from no sleep and lots of driving, Geraldine Ferraro managed to stir up all kinds of controversy. In an interview with the Breeze, Ferraro said, “If Obama was a white man, he would not be …
Follow Me